The College Football Playoff seems able to increase within the close to future. The four-team occasion might quickly change into a 12-team event, and that has led to blended reactions amongst faculty soccer followers.
Some love the concept. Others hate it.
Among the latter class are two Connecticut senators who’re anxious about whether or not the NCAA has the very best pursuits of the athletes in thoughts or if the governing physique is just in search of “another cash grab.”
“The only guaranteed outcome of an expanded playoff field and longer season is more league profit that the players won’t see a dime of – it’s just another cash grab,” stated Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. in an announcement to USA Today Sports. “I doubt if the fact that this will increase the risk of player injury even came up.”
MORE: How Notre Dame suits in a 12-team College Football Playoff
Blumenthal was backed up by his counterpart, Chris Murphy, D-Conn, who spoke in regards to the athletes not having a say on this resolution.
“This is another example of the big-time college sports executives and administrators making decisions just to increase their own revenue, while continuing to put the needs and health of college athletes on the back burner,” Murphy said. “It’s crazy that the athletes who create the product have zero say in a decision as big as this, and will get none of the millions in profit that will be created by additional games.
“This is exactly why I introduced legislation that would help these athletes organize and collectively bargain for themselves.”
Currently, the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee is making an attempt to craft a legislation that might give faculty athletes an opportunity to revenue from their identify, picture and likeness (NIL). This contains athletes with the ability to signal endorsement offers, signal autographs for pay and earn cash on numerous social media platforms, like YouTube.
MORE: Why expanded playoff ought to imply one fewer common season sport
Thus, it is no shock that Blumenthal, who chairs the committee, and Murphy could be against this sort of playoff enlargement. They wish to be sure that athletes aren’t being exploited, particularly given the inconsistent security tips and missing well being protection that student-athletes obtain.
Still, these senators’ opinions aren’t prone to have an effect on potential enlargement for the College Football Playoff. What they’ll do is proceed to debate points involving the NCAA as they give the impression of being to create an NIL legislation for athletes and, probably, pursue another laws designed to learn student-athletes.